Defence Secretary UK; from Infancy to Senility, without benefit of Maturity

DailyTelegraph

Plucked from the rank listings of the Tory Parliamentary Party by a desperate Prime Minister, desperate because she had lost the rest of that list, to fill yet another Defence resignation after the debacle of the Chequers garbage. Williamson, a former businessman with interests mainly in ceramics, had fought a losing battle for a Westminster seat in Liverpool, changed his targets and became South Staffordshire MP in 2010. After the resignation of Cameron, he led the team backing Theresa May’s bid for the Premiership (Political; not football: sorry about that), and as a result became her Chief Whip. He was subsequently appointed to Defence after Michael Fallon’s resignation. He had no experience, in any capacity whatsoever, with the needs of Defence, of the military, or indeed of the military mind.

Upon taking up his new role, Williamson discovered the reality of politics, as best shown in the letter which was left for the new chief secretary to the Treasury, by the old one, namely Liam Byrne. The note stated:- Dear chief secretary, I’m afraid there is no money. Kind regards – and good luck! Liam. Noting, as he did, the parlous state of the Defence Forces, in terms of both costly and late equipment and blindingly-obvious stupid diversity-based recruitment policies, he determined to attempt to get more cash to pay for just some of the more expensive toys. He was abruptly informed that, as the UK was presently giving £14 billions away to countries like India, who incidentally run their own space programme, as well as the bottomless pit formerly known as Black Africa; there wasn’t any new money at all, so he would have to make do.

He is now quoted as stating that Britain should pursue a new ‘global’ role, as we (GB&NI) were looked up to by Australia. He said he expected a dramatic shift in political focus after Brexit – with the UK building deeper relationships with Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Caribbean states and nations across Africa. The Defence Secretary predicted these countries would look to the UK for ‘the moral leadership, the military leadership and the global leadership’.

Now if this spouting of the usual blizzard of inanities pushed out by all British Cabinet MPs is for real, let me put Mr. Williamson straight on a few items.

Britain has one aircraft carrier busy commissioning, but as yet has no F-35 jet aircraft to fly off of her huge decks because, well, they are very, very expensive, and the R.A.F. gets first dibs on the new goodies. We also have six Type 45 destroyers: well they do exist, but are mainly tied up together because, if the sea-water gets warm, the intercoolers cannot handle the resultant load, and the whole ship’s turbine engines conk out! They are being refitted with better power sources, larger coolers, and uprated turbines; but we have to bear the cost, despite the original errors being from BAe, the clowns who built them. We have two assault ships, but the M.O.D. keeps trying to sell them. The Royal Navy has some twelve smaller destroyers, but they are nearly all tied up: BECAUSE WE HAVE NO SAILORS TO MAN THEM! We also have five Fisheries patrol vessels, but, during the recent spat with the French fishermen, not one was available, Of the FOUR R.N. vessels delegated for fishery protection duty, one was 8,000 miles away in the Falklands, HMS Forth was unable to sail because of the huge numbers of defects found after handover from BAe Systems the builders, (inclusive of electrical busbar connection bolts being GLUED back on after rupture); one is in dock for repairs, and the fourth was in Norway at, wait for it; a Culture Festival.

The first purpose of Government is to be certain that they have made sure that their Nation can be defended. Politicians, of any colour or hue, hate the very idea of Defence; because Defence, in terms of modern equipment and manpower, costs shed-loads of cash, and must be planned for over many years. Politicians detest the idea of a valid Defence, because very little about an efficient Army, Navy or Air Force can be ‘spun’ to make them look good. There is nothing a leading politician, again of any hue, likes more than to be photographed surrounded by uniformed soldiers, sailors or airmen whilst celebrating a ‘Job Well Done’: but they hate paying the bills which come due. ( We have to acknowledge that not all politicians like being photographed adjacent to tanks or big guns, such as Emily Thornberry ‘Shadow Defence’). The pronouncements of certain politicians are famous for their double-dealing lies, saying ‘Whatever you want, you can have,’ to the generals, whilst stating exactly the opposite to their Ministry servants.

I have a few tips for Minister Williamson.

  • Sort out the Defence of the Homeland first.
  • Get the cash for the ships, both working, and built.
  • Increase the budget for manpower, and ensure we have the minimum to both fly and maintain those costly jets, man and run the ships which are needed for Homeland Defence, and get rid of Capita, at present running the recruitment for the Army; and of course failing miserably. They built a website for the recruitment process, and it was so unsuccessful that 100,000 applied through a ‘call centre’ but most lost interest when they never received a call-back!
  • Ignore these stupid ideas for bases in the Caribbean, the Gulf and Singapore. If these countries wish to defend themselves, let them build and man their own defence forces, despite the habit of those self-same forces being the first to overthrow the governments who pay them.
  • Adopt President Trump’s attitude towards NATO, which states, “pay up, pay more; or we’ll pick up our tanks, missiles and other toys, and let you sort your own defence needs out against Russia”.
  • Tell this fixated stupid woman masquerading as our Prime Minister to abandon all these Treaty tie-ups with the bloody EU; such as The UK will have the possibility to participate in projects of Common Foreign and Security Policy Agencies, including the European Defence Agency, but without having any decision-making role.  We should not be tied to a failing Federal state for anything, and as the French and us are the only EU nations with anything approaching reliable defence systems, tell the other EU nations to start spending THEIR money, instead of relying on us for all the dirty work!

Evolution overturned! Says Brighton Council; and therefore it must be so!

Grandson#1Grandpa1940

Evolution. It is a simple yet so-complicated term: but most of all, it is a statement of scientific, incontrovertible fact. We, ‘Homo Sapiens’, have evolved through literal millennia, by this process; which states ‘The theory of evolution by natural selection, first formulated in Darwin’s book “On the Origin of Species” in 1859, is the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits. We, as a species, owe our entire existence to the fact that we have evolved, and continue to evolve, to deal with the process of surviving. Men and women procreate in order to have children, but also because the very act of procreation is, of itself, intensely pleasurable. Sex is necessary, but, because we are Human, we, as a species, have endowed the act of procreation, of sex, as a sign of unity within the most human of traits: the Family. Man, as the hunter-gatherer, the provider: Woman, as the nurturer, the very fount of life itself. Man is the protector, Woman, the giver of life: and so it has been for millennia.

The process of procreation has been decided by that same evolution, and this cannot be changed. Women are bestowed, at birth, with the means to allow the child to be born, care of the eggs within her body. Once a month, the eggs are released into her body and, if that egg is then fertilised by the sperm of her chosen mate; that is the process of birth commenced. Man cannot have a child by himself, it is a physiological impossibility. If sex, if the act of love is fulfilled, that small speck of life is contained within the Mother’s womb; and there it shall grow, and be nurtured by the woman’s bodily systems. At the moment of birth, that tiny speck, which is of itself already alive, has grown, developed and is expelled from the womb, and that baby is born. If the egg and associated material is not fertilised, the results are expelled from the woman’s body in what has come to be known as  ‘menstruation’, or a ‘period’.

We have two genders, Male and Female: and no matter how many foolish idiots state otherwise, there are no alternatives. A few twisted individuals may claim otherwise, many more might claim to be born with different characteristics or sensibilities; they may claim to be a man, but born into a woman’s body; or vice-versa, but they are wrong. They may wish to be acknowledged as a different gender, but, despite all the surgery, make-up, liberal wishy-washy intentions otherwise, inclusive of a severe mental illness, there is no evidence whatsoever that there are more than two genders.

So the Department of Education ought to get its top people to inform Brighton and Hove City Council to get their act together, abandon their stupid and contradictory plans for the teaching already approved.

The schools’ guidance states: “Trans boys and men and non-binary people may have periods” and “menstruation must be inclusive of all genders”.

It asserts: “language and learning about periods is inclusive of all genders”, before suggesting teachers use the phrase, “girls and women and others who have periods”.

Sanitary-product bins must also be provided in male as well as female toilets.

MP David Davies described the new guidance as “insanity” that would leave children feeling “completely confused”.

Oh, and just by the way, Islamist teaching does not accept ‘Evolution’ at all, as they state that their ‘god’ made humans perfect from day one, and thats the way it goes, boo-boo!

Bombs: Dams: Death: and the black dog.

Ronald Suchiu

One of the many films featured over the holiday period is the classic tale of the R.A.F. attack upon the three dams of the Ruhr, in Nazi Germany. The attack, by Lancaster bombers of 617 Squadron, was unique, in that the bombs, instead of dropping from a high altitude, were released from the bomber while flying at a height of sixty (60) feet. The bombs were cylindrical, and were literally revolving, turned by a motor fitted inside the Lancaster fuselage, so that the bomb’s spinning motion, moving in reverse as it hit the water, made it literally bounce across the lake surface: finally slowly sinking to the required depth below the surface. The explosive was then triggered by a pressure switch, and the full shock of the explosion was sent against the dam walls.

The trouble with the attack, which had to be carried out at an extremely low altitude and in a straight line, was that the bomber could be tracked and attacked by seriously-accurate German anti-aircraft fire during the predictable approach path. The Moehne, Eder & Sorpe dams were chosen as targets, and the Lancasters of 617 Squadron, modified to carry the three ton weight of the bombs which had to be held partly outside the bomb-bay as the spin had to be applied before the bomb was released, set off on their mission. The Moehne and Eder dams were successfully breached, albeit with heavy loss to the attacking squadron; with eight of the nineteen bombers failing to return, and fifty-three fliers in total died during the operation. Squadron Leader Guy Gibson received the Victoria Cross, there were also five D.S.O.’s, ten D.F.C.’s and four Bars, two Conspicuous Gallantry Medals and eleven Distinguished Flying Medals and one Bar. Squadron Leader Gibson’s name featured in the very successful film ‘The Dambusters’, and as it was a British production, was historically accurate, apart from the spinning of the bombs, which was still on the ‘classified’ listing: the theory presumably was that if British bombers were ever needed to breach another dam in enemy territory, we knew how to do it.

There have been many times when that film, which I watched when it was first released, has been shown on television screens across the world, but the bomber crews’ bravery; the ferocity of the German anti-aircraft fire; the fact that eight Lancasters were either shot down, crashed or failed to return; the fact that thirty-three medals, including Britain’s highest award for bravery, the Victoria Cross, were won by squadron members is never even mentioned in these po-faced days. There have been many plans to remake that film, but every time, the film plans have been derailed because of the deep ‘Offence’ which arises every time the raid is mentioned. These days, where every other second bastard is offended, or allegedly takes deep offence, because of the name given a pet dog, a name which, in those days where men flew against a ruthless enemy every night, was simply the colour of the dog’s black fur in the vernacular. The dog who died, as he was killed by a hit-and-run driver, whilst his master, Guy Gibson, risked his life for his Country. Yes; the horror: the scandal, the terrible, terrible truth, which still scars those brave men’s memories even some seventy-five years since those Rolls Royce-powered propellers took those bombers on their deadly, dangerous mission: the black Labrador dog’s name was Nigger!

Invaded. Rapes and Murders. No Revolution!

Manchester Arena TheCuttingSuite

We have been invaded. That is a fact, for much of Europe, inclusive, for now, of the British Isles. True, the invasion was carried out in full view of the populace, but not a shot was fired in our defence, not a single Governing voice was raised in warning, excepting a trusty number of blogsite voices, one or two mainstream news websites, and the remainder, all cast away in the ‘Far-Right’ category, so well is the propaganda working against us. The invasion is almost normalised, with the complaisant politicians, the Quislings on the Labour, Tory and Lib-Dim benches truly happy with their efficient sell-out of our Nation State, with our very Nation invaded all in the cause of Global Harmony.

I believe that all who read this polemic will know exactly of that which I speak and write of. If you think, or if you have any kind of an open mind, you will have already come to the same conclusion as I. But, although the invasion is ongoing, it is not yet complete; and the question is: what will it take to arouse a slumbering population, semi-catatonic in front of a tv screen, (not less that 55”, obviously, and in full High Definition) watching the modern equivalent of ‘Bread and circuses’, but now coming dressed as “Love Island” or ‘Strictly something or other’! What kind of atrocity would it take to arouse a nation which has been plastered with left- and liberal-propaganda, so that a nationwide epidemic of Muslim rape gangs brings nothing more that “Its only a few, and they’re in jail now” as a response from a brain-washed, or rather brain-dead population after approximately 2,000 (and counting) young white girls were groomed, targeted and raped. 22 (Twenty-two) died in a terror bombing at a kids pop concert in Manchester, with 139 wounded, half of them were kids. Eight dead in the terror attack at London Bridge and Borough Market

Is this the same nation who, when the Government stated, back in 1939, that Nazi Germany’s blitzkrieg attacks on Poland were an attack on an ally, and as Germany had ignored our warning, we were at war with Germany? The British stood forward, and joined the Armed Services in their thousands. Others volunteered for War Work. Many died, some in vain, with many mistakes made; but our hearts were in the right frame, and with the help of allies: we came through.

We have invited these blood-crazed monsters into our midst, and, slowly but surely, our very Laws have been subverted so that if anyone speaks out too loudly, they are pilloried, ostracised, or imprisoned. How many must die before this nation of ours actually wakes up, and realises that its is almost too late. How many would actually realise that a Muslim Home Secretary is, even now, planning the ‘overhaul’ of our immigration schemes, but a significant gap will be noticed when it comes to migrants from ‘The Commonwealth’. The gap, no restrictions will be placed upon ‘family and relatives’ migration, and where do the vast majority of commonwealth migrants actually come from? Pakistan, Bangladesh, and all the Muslim hangers-on posing as asylum-seekers from the sewage-dumps of Iran, Afghanistan and all stops east.

The young lady in the following video asks the ONLY question, and also speaks the truth. How many have to die before we, as a Continent, wake up to reality?

Chinese Concentration Camps regrettable but understandable

Al Jazeera, one of this world’s truly unbiased news reporting services (Note to self:- Mike, you must limit your use of sarcasm) tells us that China is taking massive steps to destroy the Uighur Muslim population, who populate Xinjiang – the autonomous region in western China; by force of separation, detention and ‘re-education’. The Arabic news service, based in Qatar, and funded by the Qatar Royal family, themselves true devotees to democracy and the wider rule of Law (Not again, Mike: this constant sniping does you little credit,) has targeted the Communist Chinese in their alleged targeting of their Muslim populations, and especially the Uighurs in the western province of Xingiang.

Seems as though the Communist Chinese, after the invasion, destruction, annexation and subjugation of Buddhist Tibet was supinely noted by the whole world, with absolutely no retaliations, reprisals or sanction against that truly dictatorial regime for the ruthless attack upon a peaceful neighbouring State, have decided that one playbook is good enough to trot out again. The Uighurs, the majority of whom live in the western edges of China, are almost 100% Muslim in religious beliefs. Al Jazeera is reporting  the UN’s discovery that the Chinese are building ten super-sized Concentration Camps, capable of holding up to two million Uighurs, and then proceeding to attack their basic beliefs, their religion, and religious practices. The Chinese do this because they understand that, although peaceful right now, ten million Muslims can be inflamed with a single speech from a fundamentalist mullah, or a ‘Fatwa’ which preaches against, not cartoons of Mohammed or satirical French newsheets, but the anti-religious diktats of a Communist Regime intolerant of ANY dissent whatsoever.

Remember, when one discusses the Communists of the People’s Republic, you must recall the memories of the blood-soaked cobblestones of Tiananmen Square. When the PRC Commissars sent in the tanks of their Mongolian Shock Army against the unarmed students, and by crushing them beneath those tank tracks, or machine-gunning those who stood upright, sent approximately seven thousand to the mass graves, and a further fifteen thousand to the slave labour camps: THAT was the reaction of those murderous Leaders of the People’s Republic.

So when that same Chinese Government watched as the Muslim Invasion (in heavy disguise as ‘economic migrants’, of course); sweep out of Syria  and Turkey, and across half-a-continent to Germany, Sweden and Denmark, and saw the supine disengagement of the Governments of those nations, who literally welcomed the invaders across their borders, they determined that no Muslim swarm would be allowed to exist, even a thousand miles away from Beijing itself. The Chinese Communists watched with understanding and deep interest as the Burmese military uprooted hundreds of thousands of Rohingya Muslims from Rakhine province in Burma (Myanmar), and sent them scattering across the border to Bangladesh. The PRC leaders completely understood the reasons behind the mass deportation of over 750,000 Muslims, and if a few died, the memories might be further imprinted on the mass Muslims, in that ‘this is what happens to prospective terrorists’ and that message is well implanted. The report by Al Jazeera focuses on the effect of the forced deportations of Uighurs, the removal of the children to state ‘orphanages’ where the very memory of their ancestors will be wiped from the young minds of those who have been taken.

The Arab news channel states that the Chinese determine to wipe the Uighur identity off the planet, and I agree with their assessment; but, perhaps surprisingly, cannot completely condemn the Chinese for their forced assimilation techniques. The Chinese have always thought ‘Long’; have made their moves as though they are indeed planning for the next century, not the next election cycle, as in the Western World which they so despise. The Chinese have long memories, and recall, as yesterday, the times when the Nations of the West, and of Japan, rode imperiously over their lands, importing heroin as trade goods for the riches of Imperial China. They do not wish to keep a threat on their western border, and if they react in the fashion which they are doing; they know that the West will not raise a single noise against their actions. Why? It’s all to do with ‘business’, with ‘trade’, with perhaps a concession from the West to the whining ‘liberals’ that they will ‘raise the Human Rights’ bit before they sign all those big contracts full of lovely profit. The West gave the Olympics to China, and the Chinese made all those wonderful promises about freedom of speech, along with all the other sheer, unadulterated bullshit, and after the Games were barely over, the artists, the journalists, the calls for religious tolerance: everything was back to usual, suppressed, neutered, banished or simply ‘Disappeared’!

Al Jazeera might want to take a look in its own backyard, with the well-known Islamic intolerance for any other religion, before swiping at China; a proto SuperPower, which is only doing what it feels is necessary to remove a cancer before it becomes malignant!

 

A heartbeat away from the Pope! Catholic Cardinal Pell guilty!!!

Daniel Munoz/Reuters

In a secret trial in Australia, the former holder of the third highest Office in the Catholic Church was found guilty of molesting and abusing youngsters; that molestation happening in the 1990’s. Pell, the Vatican’s former finance chief and the highest Vatican official to be committed for trial in the never-ending saga of the robed priestly kiddy-fiddlers protected by the Catholic Church versus the now middle-aged and sometimes elderly accusers; ended with a unanimous guilty verdict. The former Cardinal now faces a second trial regarding accusations that he interfered with, fondled and touched the genitals of two boys who were swimming alongside him in a Ballarat swimming pool when Pell was just a young priest.

This trial was no ordinary run-of-the-mill Catholic administrator accused of covering-up the vast numbers of abuse cases. (I paused when I wrote those words; imagine a scenario when it becomes almost routine to report on a priest who has been indulging in homosexual abuse with a child under his temporary care!) This trial was about a Cardinal of the Faith, the point below the pinnacle of the Church, which is the Pope. Just cast your minds back to the conclave which elected Pope Francis: you will find that Cardinal Pell was one of just 124 Cardinal Electors who sat in secret, within the Vatican. You must also realise that Pell, as a Cardinal, was just as likely to be chosen as Pope as the man who achieved that rare honour and privilege, Francis being the 266th in direct succession to Peter. So a convicted paedophile stood as much a chance of being elected Pope. The Leader of 675 million Roman Catholics, if Francis had not been selected, COULD have been Cardinal George Pell. A literal heartbeat away from the papacy! Is this the first time that anyone has actually considered this possibility? This twisted deviant, a former top guy in the Catholic Hierarchy, might have been Pope!

There is one other point which I would write about, if a Cardinal being found guilty of being a serial paedophile wasn’t enough. My first words were, and I quote, “In a secret trial in Australia,”, Pell was, ultimately, found guilty of abominable behaviour against small boys in the 1990’s. But his trial was not covered, or reported upon, ANYWHERE in Australia. The judge clamped a banning order after the prosecution’s request; and it was granted to “prevent a real and substantial risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice.” That order remains in place in Australia. One of the foundations of democratic behaviour is open justice, where news reporters can state what happened within a trial; what was said or alleged; who said those words, and ultimately; hor the trial progressed. But because of a high profile defendant, the Australian public will NEVER know what was said, alleged or even given under oath in this, or any other trial where such a blanket ban operates.

We have the same judge-operated ban working in Great Britain, but those banned trials are now, almost always, reserved for the trials of Muslims, some British but mostly Pakistani; on charges of grooming, sexual abuse, rape and trafficking: almost entirely of White British girls and young women. Has anyone ever asked the Attorney General why judges are allowed to hide the truth away from the great British public?

May be; or hopefully Theresa May be Not!

TheTimes

The possibility of a new, and hopefully firmer hand on the tiller of State is within our sight. At long last, the Tory letters, those sent in hope of a leader who is not so treasonous, so poisonous, so divisive, are in to the 1922 Committee, and tonight we have the ballot which, hopefully will clear away the disastrous detritus of Theresa May, this utter failure masquerading as a Tory Prime Minister.

When Theresa May emerged from the farrago which was the last leadership election, with the result that she never actually stood in an election for the leadership, but was ‘annointed’ after all the others dropped out for one reason or another: Theresa May stated that she would carry out the will of the people. We can now see, in all its unvarnished cynicism, her efforts to get Great Britain & Northern Ireland tied with steel bands in almost every area of trade, commerce, military, security, diplomatically. The one saving item in this whole farrago is the truth, the fact, that if she survives the vote, and proceeds to put this Withdrawing Treaty to Parliament, her allies within the Democratic Unionist Party (D.U.P.) of Northern Ireland will desert their Supply and Confidence Agreement with the Prime Minister, and she will not be able to get a single Bill through Parliament without depending upon sympathetic votes from opposition Party MPs. In other words, she’s damned if she does; and equally damned if she doesn’t.

Before Mrs.Theresa May stated that she would fight the vote this evening, I was confidently whistling ‘Dixie’, and considering whom would get my vote, because I am one of the thousands of Conservative party members. I am still confident I will get that vote, and I cannot wait to vote: and my vote will be for:-

 ‘Anyone who states, categorically, that we leave, on March 29 2019’, not a second later. 17.4 million of us voted for that date, and, Deal or No Deal, we want to feel the Freedom!

I would hope that the waverers, the ones who failed to follow Rees-Mogg’s example last month, in spite of their promises, now consider their promises to fulfil their duty to the Electorate, get rid of Theresa May, this shrewish failure, and choose someone who can gain respect, and thus install a leader who will speak firmly to Europe, and state, categorically, that GB&NI has just decided that we are not a supplicant, but an Independent, Sovereign Nation: ready to do business, but on OUR terms, not theirs